Time to Hire (TA Metric)

Time to Hire measures how long it takes to fill an open position – typically counted from job requisition approval to the accepted offer or start date.

The global average time-to-hire (or time to fill) for non-executive roles is around 54 days, though this varies by industry. Hiring speed directly impacts business performance and talent acquisition success.

Extended vacancies mean lost productivity and revenue – for example, if a sales role generates $1,000/day, taking 45 days to fill instead of an industry benchmark 40 days costs $5,000 in lost sales for that hire.

Scaled up (e.g. 100 such hires a year), that’s a half million-dollar opportunity cost. Faster hiring also prevents losing candidates to competitors. 

Research shows that delays in the hiring process increase the chance a candidate accepts another offer.

In fact, one of the top reasons candidates decline offers is that “there’s a better one on the table” by the time you decide. Thus, efficient time-to-hire gives companies a competitive edge in securing in-demand talent.

Companies that optimize time-to-hire reap tangible business value. 

Higher offer acceptance rates is one – keeping the process swift and candidate-friendly means fewer drop-outs. Ideally, firms shoot for 90%+ offer acceptance; if it dips below that, slow hiring is a likely culprit.

Moreover, a fast fill rate means less revenue left “on the table” from open positions and an ability to capitalize on opportunities (or demands) sooner.

For example, reducing average time-to-fill by just 5 days can save significant lost productivity – one case showed saving $5K per sales hire, translating to $500K/year for 100 hires.

Thus, time-to-fill improvements have a clear ROI. It’s no wonder that time-to-fill is regarded as a top driver of HR ROI for new initiatives.

Leading firms continually benchmark this metric against industry averages and their own past performance to ensure their recruiting engine is running at peak speed.

You May Also Like

Time to Hire Best Practices →
Here are 4 Practical ways to Improve Time to Hire

Quality of Hire
Determines how well new employees perform and contribute. Essentially this is the ultimate outcome of recruiting

Cost Per Hire →
Includes recruitment process design, steps, stages and personas

Inclusive Hiring
Track how well an organization is attracting and hiring candidates from underrepresented groups

Candidate Experience →
Refers to how job seekers perceive and feel about an organization’s hiring process

Vic Okezie is a talent acquisition leader and coach. He coaches experienced professionals to help then land Senior IC, Director and Leadership roles. Learn more →

Latest Insights

  • Replace Your CV With Portfolio of Impact

    The traditional CV no longer does enough heavy lifting. It was built to list roles, titles, and responsibilities. However, in today’s hiring market, that information rarely differentiates you. Recruiters move fast, hiring managers mitigate risk, and competition intensifies during every hiring cycle. In this environment, descriptions fall flat but outcomes cut through. That is why

    Read More →

  • Build a Career Strategy That Survives Hiring Cycles

    The job market goes through ups and downs. Hiring booms can quickly turn into freezes, in‑demand roles can lose momentum, and even strong performers can hit roadblocks they don’t control. Still, some professionals keep moving forward—finding new opportunities, growing their influence, and maintaining momentum no matter the market. The difference isn’t luck; it’s having a

    Read More →

  • How to Navigate a Career Transition

    A career transition is about reframing your strengths, targeting your learning, and leveraging relationships to move horizontally or diagonally into a new space. Think of your career as a lattice, not a ladder – a series of intentional moves that build breadth, range, and long‑term resilience. A Five‑Step Career Transition Approach 1. Map Your Transferable

    Read More →