Cost per hire in EMEA vs US varies due to differences in recruiting models, compensation norms, and process complexity. While generalizations are difficult, several patterns emerge.
A recent survey found average CPH (including onboarding) at €6,500 in Western Europe vs. $5,500 in the US—slightly higher in Europe due to longer cycles and more touchpoints.
1. Recruitment Agency Use
UK companies often rely more on agencies than US firms, especially for niche roles. Agency fees are similar: 15–20% of salary in the UK, 20–25% in the US (higher for executive roles).
US tech giants like Amazon and Google reduce costs by using large in-house teams. In EMEA, they also build internal teams but may still use agencies for hard-to-fill roles (e.g., hiring a Finnish cybersecurity expert). Internal mobility helps reduce costs—UK firms fill 10% of roles internally, saving on ads and fees.
2. Recruiter Labour Costs
US recruiters often earn more but handle higher volumes. In EMEA, recruiters may specialize by country or language, handling fewer roles and increasing cost per hire.
Companies like Microsoft centralize talent sourcing in hubs like Dublin or Prague to cut costs. One internal Microsoft report estimated $10K per technical hire and targeted savings through centralized sourcing.
3. Advertising & Sourcing
US recruiters often tend to rely on LinkedIn and Indeed. In EMEA, companies may need to post on multiple local boards (e.g., StepStone in Germany), adding cost. Also, translation and localization also add minor but cumulative expenses.
EMEA’s longer time to hire increase opportunity costs. Whilst. US firms may spend more upfront to fill roles faster, while EMEA firms risk productivity loss from delays.
4. Travel & Relocation
Virtual interviews have reduced travel costs. However, relocation remains a factor—cross-border moves in Europe are common and costly.
US firms often offer large sign-on bonuses or stock grants, especially in tech. In EMEA, perks like company cars or pensions are more common and less visible in CPH.
5. Referrals
Both regions use referrals to reduce cost per hire. US firms offer $1K–$5K bonuses; European firms offer similar amounts (e.g., €2,000 in Germany).
Referrals are cost-effective and yield high-quality hires—Meta reports strong performance and lower costs from referred candidates.
Case Examples
Hiring a tech worker in London or Paris may cost more than in Austin or Seattle due to sourcing complexity and relocation. Hiring an hourly worker in Ohio may cost more than in Poland due to labour market tightness.
Tesla’s Berlin Gigafactory faced high CPH due to rural location and union competition, while Nevada’s factory benefited from brand appeal and fewer competitors.
In conclusion, cost per hire varies by role, strategy, and market—not just region.
US firms may spend more on recruiter salaries and incentives. EMEA firms may incur higher sourcing and compliance costs. Both regions use referrals, internal mobility, and centralized systems to control costs.
You May Also Like
What is Quality of Hire? →
Quality of hire gauges how well new employees perform and contribute
How to Manage Cost Per Hire →
Learn 3 ways High-performing firms improve hiring cost
How to Improve Quality of Hire →
How to improve quality of hire, tapping into best practices from leading organizations
Time to Hire Best Practices→
Read 4 Practical ways to Improve Time to Hire
Improve Candidate Experience →
Guide with 10 Ways To improve candidate satisfaction